“Oh my G*d, Karen, you can’t just ask
people why they’re white.”
Mean Girls (2003)
The fruit is a metaphor for guilt, because, you know, Tree of Knowledge and all that. (Look, I know it’s not brilliant, but I’m tired and it was the best I could come up with...) |
Around this time four years ago, I was
busily embroiled in revision for my A2-level summer exams. I had three: a module
4 Chemistry paper; a two-and-a-half-hour French assessment including listening,
reading, and writing components; and an essay exam for History concerning the progress
of civil rights in the USA from 1865 to 1992.1
Why my secondary school settled on US
civil rights as the exam-assessed History topic for the Upper Sixth is entirely
a mystery to me; I personally found the whole affair rather dull, especially trade
union rights, and especially compared to our parallel coursework topic of the
1917 revolutions in Russia. Aside from my lack of enthusiasm for the course’s
subject-matter, however, what was perhaps even less fun was the way I would
find, in almost every lesson, what seemed to me a compelling reason to feel
guilty for being white.
The bulk of what I learned about
American civil rights history, I reckoned, could happily have been summed up as
‘White People Oppress Everyone Else’. Black Americans and Native Americans were
the two minority groups we focussed on most heavily, and in each case the story
was a grimly depressing one. Legalised segregation. Forced resettlement.
Lynchings. Disenfranchisement. And when other racial and ethnic minorities got
a peep into the curriculum,2 things were just as bad: internment
camps for Japanese Americans during the Second World War, for instance.
And my history class, a small group
populated entirely by white kids, just sat there feeling horribly guilty about
all of it.
It’s strange, isn’t it? All that stuff
wasn’t, after all, us. It wasn’t even our ancestors, unless there was
more hopping across the Pond in my classmates’ family trees than I formerly
realised – not that that’s necessarily relevant either. These were atrocities
committed decades ago by people we never knew nor had any connection with: to
feel sad and angry would have been reasonable enough, commendable even, but guilty?
Where did that come from?
Well, perhaps four years should have
been long enough for me to come up with a decent answer to that question, but I’m
still not sure I’ve got one, and I don’t doubt that people who actually study
such things could do an immeasurably superior job of coming up with one than
little old me. Still, I do have some small yield of the past few years’
ponderings to contribute towards the construction of an answer, as you’ve
probably already gathered from the fact that this post has a few paragraphs
left of it yet. Here’s what I think.
See, we know we’re not able to be
plausibly implicated in those specific crimes against people of minority racial
and ethnic backgrounds that I learned about in A-level History. Those are
things we can look at from a safe distance shaking our heads, lamenting them
and condemning them and generally making it clear we find them entirely
regrettable and altogether repulsive. To express guilt over something makes it
clear we deem said something unacceptable – and to express guilt over
atrocities in which we played no part makes it abundantly clear that we’d
never dream of actually playing a part in anything resembling such
atrocities. In other words, by feeling guilty about other people’s crimes, we automatically
avoid the question as to whether we’re guilty of any similar crimes ourselves.
Fellow white people, I’m certainly not
suggesting that any of you ever helped lynch anybody or anything like that, but
if you accept that discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities is still
a problem in this day and age, then, well, the fact is that somebody’s got to
be responsible for it. And much as it shames me to say it, I’m pretty blooming
sure that I at least am part of the problem. I do take for granted that
my own census category of White British is the norm in my society. I do prefer
to avoid discourse in which the matter of racial and ethnic background features
heavily. I do make snap judgements about people based on physical
appearance. It’s not overt or explicit, and it certainly doesn’t prevent me
from having the utmost love and respect for people from a whole variety of
racial and ethnic backgrounds; it’s more subtle than that, more silent, more
situation-specific – but I catch myself often enough to be sure that it’s
there.
I read an article some time ago in which
the author argued that white people are often happy to talk about the problem
of racism in general terms, but never prepared to acknowledge the problem of ‘I,
racist’.3 We blame the nameless, faceless System, or we blame those
Other white people – and, I suggest, we feel vaguely guilty about our ‘privilege’
even as we are blind to the ways in which we personally abuse it. We can’t be
blamed for having been born white any more than we can be blamed for the segregation
and disenfranchisement and so on that was rampant in the US in previous decades
– but if we feel guilty about something for which we’re not responsible,
that gives us space to look the other way when it comes to something for which
we are. If we determine to feel guilty about something for which we know
we can’t reasonably be blamed, we assure ourselves that deep down, we are
really innocent after all. Such guilt is, in a way, overdoing it; it’s a kind
of ostentatious socio-cultural piety, if you will, a way of
demonstrating what nice people we actually are. Vague, collective White Guilt
both shifts the focus from our own sins as individuals and asserts that we are
Not The Kind Of People who would commit such sins.
But if I know anything about sin, I know
that assuring oneself of one’s innocence is a very dangerous place to be: if
we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.4
Admitting to being ‘I, racist’ is such a massive taboo in our society that it’s
really no surprise that I should prefer to veil myself in the comfortable
detachedness of White Guilt. But none of my wrongdoing and corruption can be
veiled from the eyes of God who made all humankind in his image, and calls
individuals from all peoples and nations to belong to the great assembly of
those forgiven and made righteous by the blood of Jesus shed for them. And
indeed, if I confess even the kinds of sins my culture (or subculture) deems
most shameful (and not without reason), that reveals the depths of God’s mercy
on me even more dramatically as he proves himself faithful and just to forgive me.
Forgiveness, and the help of the Holy Spirit to fight against such sins as
racism and grow into the righteousness I have already been freely gifted – that’s
got to be better than manufacturing an illusory righteousness of my own by
wallowing around in White Guilt, right?
Footnotes
1 Would you like a Horrible Histories song about the
Montgomery Bus Boycott? Of course you would: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHttUInZHTY.
Audio and lyrics only, I’m afraid, but it’s still worth three minutes of your
day.
2 I wasn’t totally sure about the precise difference between
race and ethnicity, so I asked the Internet for help – but I’m not convinced
that what differencebetween.net says on the matter corresponds exactly to the
way we use the terms in modern Britain, http://www.differencebetween.net/science/nature/difference-between-ethnicity-and-race/,
so I’ve plumped for covering all bases by using both terms together on every
occasion.
3 I even managed to find said article in my browser history:
http://www.differencebetween.net/science/nature/difference-between-ethnicity-and-race/.
(This is why you should never delete that jazz.) The argument’s got much more
to it than the one point I remembered, and it’s far better informed than my
argument here, so maybe just go and read that instead.
4 That’s from the first letter of John, https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20John+1&version=ESVUK,
and seems to have become a bit of a favourite of mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment