Sheldon: Remember
how Leonard told you we couldn’t come to your performance because we were
attending a symposium on molecular positronium?
Penny: I
remember ‘symposium’.
Sheldon: Yes,
well, he lied.
Penny: Wait,
what?
Sheldon: He
lied, and I’m feeling very uncomfortable about it.
Penny: Well,
imagine how I’m feeling.
Sheldon: Hungry?
Tired? I’m sorry, this really isn’t my strong suit.
The Big Bang
Theory S1 E10, ‘The
Loobenfeld Decay’ (2008)
So here’s a slightly crazy-sounding proposal
for you all to run through your heresy filters: lying isn’t a sin.
What? Don’t be ridiculous. Of course it
is. What about “you shall not bear false witness against your neighbour”
(Exodus 20:16)? What about “you shall not steal; you shall not deal falsely;
you shall not lie to one another” (Leviticus 19:11)? What about “no one who
practises deceit shall dwell in my house; no one who utters lies shall continue
before my eyes” (Psalm 101:7)? What about “lying lips are an abomination to the
LORD” (Proverbs 12:22)? What about “do not lie to one another, seeing that you
have put off the old self with its practices” (Colossians 3:9)? And I hope you
realise I’ve barely scratched the surface!
Ah. Well. Yes. Such evidence would, I
grant you, appear to suggest that there’s an inherent sinfulness in
deliberately stating something that isn’t true as if it were – for the purposes
of this post, I’m dealing exclusively with lying defined as verbal assertion of
something the speaker knows is untrue, and not other forms of deception or
dissimulation – but, on the contrary, I think you’ll find that if we take all
the scriptures together, including narrative passages…
You mean narrative passages like the one
where Ananias and Sapphira are struck dead by God for lying to the apostles
about the price they received for a field?1
Actually, that wasn’t one I had in mind –
but why don’t you keep going for a bit? How many occasions in the Bible where
somebody speaks an untruth to somebody else can you think of, just off the top
of your head?
All right, let’s go: Abraham lies to
Pharaoh that Sarah isn’t his wife;2
he tells the same lie to Abimelech;3
so does Isaac, about his own wife Rebekah;4 Jacob lies to Isaac that he’s Esau5 … um … Potiphar’s wife lies to him that Joseph assaulted her6 …
Keep going. There are a few in the books
of Samuel.
Michal lies to Saul that David’s sick
when, in fact, she’s let him out through the window and put a decoy in his bed;7 David lies to Achish king of Gath about where he’s been
raiding;8 then during Absalom’s rebellion, Hushai
the Archite lies to Absalom that he’s on his side rather than David’s, so that
he can give him faulty counsel and keep David informed of his movements;9 and there’s a woman who hides the two messengers Hushai
sends in a well and lies to Absalom’s men that they’re elsewhere…10
… and the two supporters in question
consequently make it back to David, and can tell him to use the time that Hushai’s
bad advice has bought him to cross the river and regroup. A combination of
Hushai’s lying and the woman’s lying rather saves David’s skin there, don’t you
think?
Well, sure – but just because God uses a lie someone tells in order to
achieve his purposes, it doesn’t necessarily mean he endorses the telling of
the lie.11
Oh, of course not. Which is why I’m now
going to give you two examples when God quite clearly does endorse the
telling of the lie.
First, consider Shiphrah and Puah, the
Israelite midwives ordered by Pharoah to carry out mass infanticide among their
people: “But the midwives feared God and did not do as the king of Egypt
commanded them, but let the male children live. So the king of Egypt called the
midwives and said to them, ‘Why have you done this, and let the male children
live?’ The midwives said to Pharoah, ‘Because the Hebrew women are not like the
Egyptian women, for they are vigorous and give birth before the midwife comes
to them.’ So God dealt well with the midwives. And the people multiplied and
grew very strong. And because the midwives feared God, he gave them families.”12
Note how we go directly from the midwives lying to Pharoah to cover up
their illegal activity, to God blessing them for their actions.
That’s … uncomfortable.
It’s about to get even more uncomfortable.
Consider now Rahab, who hid the spies Joshua sent to scout out the city of Jericho
prior to Israel’s conquest of it: “Then the king of Jericho sent to
Rahab, saying, ‘Bring out the men who have come to you, who entered your house,
for they have come to search out all the land.’ But the woman had taken the two
men and hidden them. And she said, ‘True, the men came to me, but I did not
know where they were from. And when the gate was about to be closed at dark,
the men went out. I do not know where the men went. Pursue them quickly, for
you will overtake them.’ But she had brought them up to the roof and hid them
with the stalks of flax that she had laid in order on the roof.”13
Later, Joshua declares of Jericho: “And
the city and all that is within it shall be devoted to the LORD for
destruction. Only Rahab the prostitute and all who are with her in her house
shall live, because she hid the messengers whom we sent.” And sure
enough: “But Rahab the prostitute and her father’s household and all who
belonged to her, Joshua saved alive. And she has lived in Israel to this day,
because she hid the messengers whom Joshua sent to spy out Jericho.”14
Concealing the spies is literally the one
thing Rahab actively does in the narrative, and the fact that she lied in order
to do it is presented, I think it’s fair to say, without ambiguity or
embarrassment. This deed is then explicitly identified as the reason why she
and her household are saved when every other living thing in Jericho is
annihilated. On top of that, in the New Testament, Rahab’s concealment of the
spies is referred to as a shining example of what faith in God looks like in
action – not only once, but twice: “by faith Rahab the prostitute did not
perish with those who were disobedient, because she had given a friendly
welcome to the spies” (Hebrews 11:31); and “and in the same way was not also
Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and
sent them out by another way?” (James 2:25). How can we possibly both commend
Rahab’s actions as an imitable demonstration of faith, and simultaneously
characterise what she did as sinful? We’ve got to forsake one or the other –
and since scripture unequivocally demands the former with reference to this
specific scenario, the latter must be the one to go. It cannot be a sin
in and of itself merely to deliberately state a falsehood as if it were true.
But what about “lying lips are an
abomination to the LORD” and so forth?
I’ll deal with that next week, God
willing. For the moment, I’ll leave you with this: where scripture condemns
lying, it must be condemning something other than mere verbal assertion of
something the speaker knows is untrue. As to what that is, why not have a
ponder and a pray and a search of the scriptures over the next few days – and then
see whether your conclusions match up with mine?
Footnotes
1 That’s in Acts 5. I’m not doing hyperlinks to Bible passages
this week because there would be an altogether unwieldy number of them.
2 Genesis 12.
3 Genesis 20.
4 Genesis 26.
5 Genesis 27.
6 ♫
It’s all there in chapter thirty-nine of Genesis… ♫
7 1 Samuel 19.
8 1 Samuel 27.
9 2 Samuel 16.
10 2 Samuel 17.
11 This is the approach that GotQuestions takes to this issue: https://www.gotquestions.org/white-lies.html.
I don’t think they present the full picture.
12 Exodus 1.
13 Joshua 2.
14 Joshua 6.
No comments:
Post a Comment