“Mr and Mrs Dursley, of number four,
Privet Drive, were proud to say that they were perfectly normal, thank you very
much.”
J. K. Rowling, Harry
Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone (1997)
I’m currently reading the first Harry
Potter book in Latin.1 Yes, fine, take a moment now to groan at the
surpassing excess of my nerdiness, but you know, I’ve got to keep my Latin
going somehow, given that I don’t use it at work or devotionally the way I do
my other ancient languages, and since a good friend was kind enough to gift me
a copy of Harrius Potter et Philosophi Lapis at the end of last year, I’ve
been very much enjoying picking it up at intervals and slowly working my way
through the opening chapters. Slowly, because my Latin might be good but it’s
not that good, and of course there’s a great deal of unfamiliar
vocabulary to contend with in a book set several centuries after Latin ceased
to be a living language. Some of my favourites among the author’s coinages
include birotula automataria ‘motorbike’ (literally ‘two little wheels
acting of themselves’), Ferriviae Subterraneae Londoniensis ‘London
Underground’ (literally ‘underground carrying ways of London’), Pedibus
Suspensis per Tulipas Eamus ‘Tiptoe Round the Tulips’ (literally ‘we go
through the tulips with hesitant feet’), fasciculus frustrorum fragilium ‘crisp
packet’ (literally ‘little packet of brittle bits of food’), and sorbillum
glaciatum transatlanticum ‘knickerbocker glory’ (which I am really
struggling to literally translate; ‘frozen transatlantic sippable thing’ is
about as close as I can get).
Still, being forced to read slowly for
linguistic reasons has its advantages in that it grants the brain a little more
time to mull over the information it’s taking in; often when I read a
compelling novel, I find myself devouring the words on the page so quickly that
I’m not even registering half of them, so the contrast provided by my progress
through Harrius Potter… is not an unwelcome one. I haven’t even got as
far as Harry’s entrance into the weird and wonderful world of witchcraft and
wizardry yet; at the moment, he still exists in the utterly mundane
middle-class realm of Mr and Mrs Dursley of number four, Privet Drive –
perfectly normal, thank you very much, and anything that doesn’t fit into that
mould can be shoved into the cupboard under the stairs and never spoken of in
polite company.
Here’s the thing, though: much as the
Dursleys are relentlessly given over to the business of convincing everyone in
their acquaintance of how entirely and unshakably normal they are, it
really isn’t very normal, having agreed to adopt your orphaned nephew, to
despise him, neglect him, and generally treat him as some shameful burden
undeserving of the attention, affection, and gifts so liberally lavished on his
cousin. In fact, the Dursleys’ single-minded pursuit of total, uninfringed normality
leads them to do all sorts of things that are decidedly abnormal. On the car
ride to the zoo for Dudley’s birthday trip, for instance, when Harry casually
mentions that he had a dream about a flying motorbike, it would have been far
more normal for Mr Dursley to have made some mild remark to the effect
that that was an interesting dream, than to do what he actually did, which was
nearly crash the car, then turn entirely round and yell animalistically in
Harry’s direction that motorbikes don’t fly. Later, when Harry’s
Hogwarts letters start showing up in ever-increasing numbers, Mr Dursley’s
behaviour spirals further and further from anything that could be described as ‘normal’.
He sleeps in the hallway to stop Harry sneaking down to seize the next letter
when it arrives; he takes a day off work in order to spend his time blocking up
the letterbox; he takes another day off to construct yet more elaborate post
obstructions; and eventually he compels his entire family to leave the house,
with five minutes’ notice and the intention of bunkering down in some remote
place where the letters won’t be able to reach them. They end up in a tiny,
dilapidated hut on a rocky offshore island,2 Mr Dursley being positively
gleeful that a storm is predicted that night. ‘Perfectly normal’? Hardly. And
we’re given some charming little details that embroider that picture of
abnormality all the more: Mr Dursley is so wound up by the whole business that
he attempts to use a piece of fruitcake as a hammer, that he jumps at the
slightest noise; on the car journey, he continually doubles back on himself,
stops in various random secluded locations before deeming them insufficiently
remote, and even starts muttering to himself about the need to shake the
mysterious letter-senders off their trail. Dudley’s reaction captures the thing
beautifully: “Daddy’s gone mad, hasn’t he?”
In short, the Dursleys’ obsession with
demonstrating to the world how perfectly normal they are, thank you very much,
is the very thing that leads them to behave in such a fashion as to prove
themselves thoroughly abnormal. They are so fixated on the result that
they should come across as normal, that they are prepared to do all manner of
abnormal things in the hope of achieving that result. By striving after the façade
of the thing, they forfeit the thing itself. And I do wonder whether this doesn’t
apply to most, even all, qualities that we might hold to be virtues worth
striving after. I mean, I’ve personally always taken ‘normal’ as an insult
rather than an aspiration, but what about other adjectives we might want people
to associate with us? What about ‘courageous’ or ‘strong’ or ‘brilliant’?
Well, devoting oneself to coming across
as courageous isn’t a courageous thing to do; it’s not courageous to be afraid of
something so flimsy and unthreatening as other people’s opinions. And devoting
oneself to coming across as strong doesn’t evince strength, because strength
doesn’t need to rely on the fickle external condition of other people’s
opinions. And devoting oneself to coming across as brilliant – here’s the one
that cuts closest for me personally – couldn’t, in actual fact, be more stupid,
because real brilliance seeks truth and knowledge regardless of whether or not
it aligns with other people’s opinions.
Not to mention, devoting oneself to
coming across as righteous is a sure-fire method of proving one’s unrighteousness:
“Be on your guard not to practise your righteousness in front of people, so as
to be seen by them; otherwise, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven,”
and all that.3 Which is a section of scripture I feel I mention
disproportionately often on my blog, but then, also one I feel bears the
repetition. It’s easy to laugh at the Dursleys and their obsession with coming
across as normal, their terror of that façade being shattered if their
neighbours should ever somehow find out about their wizarding relatives – but when
I think about how much I too am governed by a desire to present myself as
having some desirable quality or other, I can see rather more of myself in them
than I’d like.
And this is serious business. To strive
after the façade of the thing is to forfeit the thing itself; to practise
righteousness in front of people is to lose any recognition of righteousness on
that count in the eyes of the one whose opinion on the subject actually
matters. I’m not saying our status as righteous in Christ is under threat, just
to be clear; if you believe that he’s borne your sins and paid for them and irrevocably
gifted you his perfection in exchange, then he has, end of. Indeed, it’s only
on that foundation that I’m able to exhort you to strive for righteousness at
all; without Christ, that would be an entirely futile endeavour. So, having been
given what we have, whyever would we devote ourselves to the pursuit of a thing
for which there is no lasting reward, a thing the world could have given us
anyway, the mere appearance of righteousness? Wouldn’t it be so much
better to be governed by pursuit of the thing itself, rather than the façade of
it? Wouldn’t it be so much better to seize the opportunity we now have, to
attain, however imperfectly in this life, to actual righteousness?
This is a conversation I’ve been having
with myself a fair bit lately. I’m so done with living like Mr Dursley,
in pursuit of the appearance of the qualities I esteem, rather than the
reality of them, and so doomed never to truly attain to the latter. It is
staggering, having explicitly made the decision and pleaded God’s help in
implementing it, how many times a day I catch myself thinking, oh, but I can’t
or I must do that, otherwise so-and-so will think such-and-such about me. And perhaps
it’s just me who’s so governed by the desire to come across a certain
way, but I doubt it; I dare you to try noticing it in yourself. In this as in
everything, though, the best and only weapons we have are the gospel and the
scriptures and the presence of God’s Spirit in us – and so I read and I pray
and I preach to myself, that my identity is wholly in Christ and nothing else
matters, not really. My Father declares me righteous – though only at the cost
of the blood of his Son – and that’s the most desirable quality I could ever
hope to attain to. I have the real thing, and have only to grow into it; and
the less I concern myself with pursuing the mere façade, the more I shall, indeed,
grow into it.
Footnotes
1 If you didn’t know such a thing was obtainable, I hasten
to assure you it most certainly is: https://www.hive.co.uk/Product/J-K-Rowling/Harry-Potter-and-the-Philosophers-Stone-Latin--Harrius-Po/16438978.
2 ‘Hut on the Rock’ is the name of one of the tracks on the
soundtrack album for Harry Potter and the Cursed Child; whatever you
might think of the play itself, I enthusiastically recommend the score (written
by Imogen Heap, drawing heavily on her own earlier work) if only as good
background music for studying: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3QDBgSoUuA&list=OLAK5uy_m-1B7M6sXjAr4Wf5OTzq9aiYKrbkjEcJE&index=7.
3 Matthew 6 – but you knew that, right? https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matt+6&version=ESVUK
No comments:
Post a Comment